Regency Bicentennial:   Sir John Lade Liberated

Though the exact date is unknown, it was two centuries ago, in 1814, that the infamous and notorious Sir John Lade was released from debtor’s prison, where he had spent several months. Though he had been heir to an enormous fortune in his youth, Sir John Lade had managed to burn through it over the course of a wild and unconventional life. Eventually, he was unable to continue putting off his creditors, and they had him incarcerated for his many debts. But despite his reckless life, Lade had made a number of loyal friends, and they were able to convince one of the most powerful men in the country to come to his aid.

Sir John Lade’s path to prison . . .

Baby John was the second Baronet Lade from the moment of his birth, in August of 1759, since his father, the first Baronet, died before he was born. He also inherited his father’s vast fortune, derived from the brewing industry. His uncle, the MP Henry Thrale, was also a wealthy brewer, whose wife was the diarist and patron of the arts, Hester Thrale. John’s mother, Henry Thrale’s sister, regularly sought advice in the raising of her son from a family friend, Dr. Samuel Johnson, the noted, if rather eccentric, man of letters. Though Dr. Johnson held a very low opinion of the young man’s intellectual powers, he advised Lady Lade to endeavour to provide her son with a sound education. She attempted to do so, but young John disappointed both his mother and the famous lexicographer. He was a very poor student and never took advantage of the education which was provided for him.

When he attained his majority at the age of twenty-one, Sir John Lade also gained full control of his enormous fortune. This event inspired Dr. Johnson to write a poem, To Sir John Lade, on His Coming of Age, in which he predicted a sorry end for the young man. It is certain that Sir John Lade took full advantage of his wealth as soon as it was in his power to do so. Gambling was one of his favorite pastimes, though he never ignored women or alcoholic beverages. But his primary interest was always horses.

Sir John soon gained a reputation as a knowledgeable judge of fine horses. He also became a noted whip and was so expert with the reins that he was considered by many to be the finest driver and horseman in all of England. He earned the nickname Jehu for his driving skill. Lade was also one of the founders of the famous Four-in-Hand Club, though he is reputed to have regularly driven a team of six matched greys. It was not long before he attracted the attention of the Prince of Wales, also an avid horseman. They became such good friends that Lade was seen from time to time driving the Prince’s prized six-horse hitch of matched bays along the London to Brighton road, with the Prince on the box beside him.

However, it was not enough for Sir John Lade to drive with the skill of the best of the Royal Mail coachmen. He also chose to dress like them, wearing the garb of a typical mail coachman, or riding clothes, almost all of the time, even in formal social settings. It is also said that he carried a whip nearly everywhere he went. Part of his practical, if rather negligent, style of dressing was the simple knot in which he typically tied his cravat. That knot was copied by the members of the Four-in-Hand club and came to be known as the Four-in-Hand knot. Perhaps ironically, that same knot is still used today by many men when they tie their neckties, usually to be worn with a suit. There were other horse-mad gentlemen who came to ape Sir John Lade’s style of dressing, but few of them went as far as he did to emulate the top coachmen. Lade also had his front teeth filed, as many of them did, so that he could mimic the special loud whistle they could make through the spaces in their teeth. Only a few other gentlemen of the time went so far as to have their own teeth filed like Sir John.

Lade definitely enjoyed driving teams of horses, but he was very interested in racehorses as well. He was aquatinted with the notorious Irishman, Dennis O’Kelley, the owner of the famous racehorse, Eclipse. Sir John also bought and sold a number of racehorses himself. Perhaps the most notable was Medley, a handsome grey stallion who won eleven plate races and two match races while he was owned by Sir John. When Medley’s racing career was over, Lade sold him to Richard Tattersall, the famous horse dealer. Tattersall sold Medley on to a breeder in Virginia, after the ban on the importation of English horses had been lifted in the United States. The grey stallion, who could trace his bloodline back to the Godolphin Arabian through both his sire and his dam, went on to become one of the most important sires in America in the last decades of the eighteenth century. Unfortunately for Sir John Lade, though he did have a good eye for prime horseflesh, he was not always so wise when it came to betting on horse races. He often lost large sums at race meetings. Initially, Lade’s vast fortune could cover his gambling losses and he continued to bet heavily with little concern for the financial outcomes.

Horse races were not the only events on which Sir John Lade was willing to lay a wager. He bet on just about anything which took his fancy, especially if it involved a demonstration of his own skill. He bet on his ability to drive the off-side (left) wheels of his phaeton over a six pence piece. On another occasion, he wagered that he could drive a full four-in-hand rig and team around the confined space of Tattersall’s sales yard at Hyde Park Corner. One day in Brighton, Sir John bet he could carry the tall and burley Lord Cholmondley on his back, from a mark opposite the Royal Pavilion, twice around the Steine. But at the appointed time, Lade demanded that Cholmondley strip off before he attempted to carry him. Cholmondley refused to remove his clothes, but Lade replied that he had only engaged to carry Cholmondley, but not his clothes and again demanded that he strip. Several ladies had heard of the planned feat of the small man carrying the large one and were in attendance as spectators. After some argument, Cholmondley, unwilling to be seen naked in public, particularly in front of a group of ladies, conceded the bet to Lade. This particular wager became the subject of multiple lewd caricatures.

Though Sir John won a large percentage of his many bets, he did not win all of the them. And most of his wagers were for substantial sums. He usually settled his debts once each quarter on Monday, at Tattersall’s. Lade came to refer to those days as "Black Monday." There was also another drain on his resources. Sir John married the equally notorious Letitia Derby, who had been the mistress of the infamous highwayman, "Sixteen String Jack" Rann until he was captured and hung. She was later under the protection of the Duke of York, until she was introduced to Sir John Lade. She enjoyed riding and driving as much as Lade, and eventually they were married. They were two of a kind, and Lady Lade laid as many wagers as did her husband. They had both become great favorites with the Prince Regent and they regularly traveled in exalted social circles, not an inexpensive way to live. Sir John had also begun dabbling in the promotion of theatrical productions, few of which were successful.

Inevitably, Lade’s spendthrift lifestyle caught up with him, and in 1814, his many creditors had him committed to King’s Bench debtors prison. Even though he had been imprisoned for debt, Lade still had enough money to be allowed "the liberty of the rules." That is, he was allowed to live in one of the houses outside the main prison, but adjacent to it. By the terms of the prison marshal, as a "ruler," he was forbidden from entering any taverns or theatres, but otherwise, he could live a relatively normal life, though travel was restricted. Lady Lade was loyal to her husband and she took up residence with him in his rooms near the prison. Sir John and Lady Lade were regularly visited by their friends. In addition, they made the acquaintance of several other prominent debtors, including Lady Emma Hamilton and Mr. William Taylor, the manager of the Opera House. Apparently, these gatherings could become quite exuberant, fueled by the generous consumption of wine. It is reported that one evening, after too much drinking, Mr. Taylor tried to take advantage of Lady Lade. Not a woman to tolerate any attempt on her person, Lady Lade doused him with the contents of a boiling kettle. This had the desired effect of "cooling" him down and bringing him to his senses. There is no record Taylor ever again tried to take such liberties with Lady Lade.

Lady Lade was free to come and go as she pleased, but she would not desert her husband. Though the Lades’ life was nowhere near as uncomfortable and unpleasant as was that of the regular inmates of King’s Bench Prison, it did not allow them the complete freedom to which they were accustomed. After a few months, the novelty, such as it was, had worn off and they became increasingly eager to regain their freedom. Several of their wealthier friends contributed to the payment of the bulk of Sir John’s debts. They also urged the Prince Regent to come to the aid of his long-time friend. Sir John and Lady Lade were two of the Regent’s most disreputable friends, and perhaps because of that, he made the effort to help them. Once Lade was freed from King’s Bench late in 1814, he was made the Regent’s official driving tutor, with a salary of £300 per year. Either to save face for Lade, or to hide the expense from the government, the bank drafts were made out to the "Reverend Dr. Tolly."

Once they left debtors prison, the Lades did significantly curtail their extravagant lifestyle. Though they still attended several race meetings each year, there were no longer any enormous wagers laid. They began to spend more time on Lade’s stud farm in Sussex and less time in London or Brighton with others of the Carlton House set, which helped to reduce their expenses. By the time the Regency came to a close and George IV had become king, they were seldom seen in London. Over the years, George remained loyal to them, though they no longer spent much time with him, and, as king, his time was consumed with affairs of state. He not only continued their annual pension, but he raised it to £400 and eventually to £500. Lady Lade passed away in 1825, during the reign of George IV. But her husband lived on, mostly at his stud farm, until 1838. Remarkably, both William IV and Queen Victoria continued paying his pension, so he was able to live fairly comfortably in his retirement.

So, in 1814, two centuries ago this year, the wild lifestyle of Lord and Lady Lade came to a rather abrupt end. The pair spent several months in the rules of King’s Bench Prison, before they were freed by the efforts of their friends. They were able to survive after their release on a pension provided to them by the Prince Regent, which he continued to the end of their lives. They may have had some small income from the stud farm which Sir John had inherited from his father, but it would not have been enough to support them, even after they began to economize. Despite his wild and disreputable lifestyle, Sir John Lade lived to the ripe old age of seventy-nine years.

That same year, 1814, also marked the beginning of the gradual decline of the heyday of the Regency rake. Beau Brummell had already fallen out with the Regent and would flee England a little over a year later to escape his many debts. Within the next few years, other rakes would be confined to debtors prisons or retire to the country on lengthy "repairing leases" due to their heavy debts and/or failing health. A few were happily married and had settled into lives of harmonious domesticity. And somehow, the next generation of rakes were just not as rakish or flamboyant as those who had come of age before the Regency began.

Advertisements

About Kathryn Kane

Historian with a particular interest the English Regency era.   An avid reader of novels set in that time, holding strong opinions on the historical accuracy to be found in said novels.
This entry was posted in People and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Regency Bicentennial:   Sir John Lade Liberated

  1. Fascinating. My first acquaintance with Lady Lade is by mention of her in Georgette Heyer’s ‘Friday’s Child’ where heroine Hero aka Kitten, races with her. Nice to see Prinny being loyal to a friend.

    • Kathryn Kane says:

      I “met” Lady Lade for the first time in Friday’s Child, too. But I did not realize she was an historical figure until some years later. I was rather surprised, since I had always thought all Regency women were very proper and sedate. Lady Lade may not have come from the upper crust, be she could have shown many of them a thing or two. And she stood by her husband through thick and thin, which gets her a lot of points in my book.

      Prinny was not often loyal to his friends, and he could be quite parsimonious when paying out pensions, so it was a surprise to me to find he had given Lade a pension and that he maintained and even raised it. I could see William IV continuing it, since he had been rather a rake in his day, too. But I was surprised to learn that even when Queen Victoria knew where the money was going, she did not stop it. Very decent of her.

      =^..^=

      • Is it terribly cynical to wonder whether Sir John knew where some family secrets were buried?
        I too was amazed by how much Lady Lade was allowed to get away with, considering that Caroline Lamb was blackballed from Almack’s for her writing and that scandal with tea was a way of life. Did everyone love the Lades? or did they collectively know too much? but they seem too genial for that.
        And yes, her loyalty to her husband endears her to me, too….
        My husband knew the common tie knot was called a ‘four in hand’ and had often wondered why and had never thought to mention it to me before. You learn something every day.

        • Kathryn Kane says:

          I am not sure that Lady Lade was “allowed” to get away with anything, I think she just did as she pleased and, as my Grandma used to say, “Let the Devil take the hindmost.” From what I can tell, she was not accepted into polite society, except by the Carlton House set and people looking to suck up to Prinny. But she does not seen to have cared, she was as horse-mad as Sir John was, which was her main interest in life.

          Of course, she had been mistress to Prinny’s favorite brother, the Duke of York, who was no saint. So maybe she knew something about him. But she does not seem to have been the underhanded blackmailing type to me. My take is that both of the Lades were very honest, and I suspect that is the main reason that Prinny was fond of them. They never tried to snow him, they just told it like it was. I doubt Prinny had too many folks like that around him and unless he was a complete dunce, he would have valued that highly. Also, Prinny had alienated Brummell the year before, so he may not have wanted to loose another close friend. Or, he might have shown Lade such favor to rub salt in Brummell’s wounds.

          Regards,

          Kat

  2. Thank you for the entertaing and beautifully written post about Sir John Lade. Reading it makes me wanting to use him in a novel. He is just too entertaining and scandalous to be left out.
    Do you happen to know if there is a biography about him?

    • Kathryn Kane says:

      So far as I know, there is no full-length biography of Sir John Lade. I suspect that for many years, no one would even try to write one, knowing it would be unlikely they could find a publisher for a story which would have been too risque for most readers. However there is a chapter on him in volume 6 Edwin Beresford Chancellor’s The Lives of the Rakes, which was published back in the 1920s. It is a six volume set which covers many of the best-known English rakes of the 18th and 19th centuries, but it is very hard to find.

      Sadly, the set is not online anywhere that I have searched. Your best bet would be to contact the Inter-Library Loan department at your local library. The set is still held by a number of libraries around the world, and they should be able to get it for you. Or, you can try used book sellers, but be prepared, the full set is very expensive. However, you can sometimes find individual volumes from broken sets at reasonable prices. Good Luck!

      Kat

  3. Pingback: 1814:   The Year in Review | The Regency Redingote

  4. Pingback: History A'la Carte 2-5-15 - Random Bits of Fascination

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s